That's the only explanation I can think of that makes any sense. I wonder what the date represents??
Do you know if the apache entry in the errata pages was also updated sometime in the past 48 hours? If so, I'll add a note to my little, er, growing update procedure to not trust the errata pages to grow in chronological order. Always look to see what else may have "popped" in somewhere else down the list. Regards, Mike Klinke On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:36, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 16:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >From my up2date log: > > > > [Fri Dec 13 17:19:38 2002] up2date new up2date run started > > [Fri Dec 13 17:22:33 2002] up2date installing packages: > > ['apache-1.3.27-2', 'mm-1.1.3-11', 'mm-devel-1.1.3-11', > > 'wget-1.8.2-4.73'] > > > > and the errata page for 7.3 links to: > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-222.html > > apache-1.3.27-2.i386.rpm 6eb4e656c5310116e0cccc4e09002d2c > > which is dated 11-25 > > > > What leads you to believe these are different packages? Perhaps I'm > > missing something obvious to everyone but me. > > ... I should have looked more closely at the errata notice. I can't > explain the date thereon, but those packages showed up on Red Hat's FTP > mirrors within the last 48 hours; I saw them download to my mirror this > morning. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
