Matthew's note did bring something to my attention that I didn't realize.  
Chuck's response below which included the links to the errata pages was 
interesting in that I see the RH 7.3 Apache update is dated 11-25 on the 
page.  I seldom visit this page unless it's for a special reason as I tend to 
use the up2date mechanism.  On Dec 7th I ran up2date and was notified that 
there were updates including both the Samba and Xinetd fixes (which bracket 
the Apache  entry on the errata page).  Today I ran up2date and was advised 
the Apache update was available. 

Clearly there is some delay between the errata page and the up2date mechanism. 
I can rationalize the delay as part of the RH strategy to manage traffic but 
since the security of my machines are my responsibility, not RH's, I guess 
I'll be visiting the errata page more often.  I do admit that I, like 
Matthew, resort to the source tarball if I feel "naked" and his mention of 
the OpenSSL 3.1p1 vulnerability is one where I've gone that route.

Regards, Mike Klinke


On Friday 13 December 2002 16:25, Chuck Mead wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Matthew Boeckman enscribed the following:
>
> MB>> Are you sure that they're not addresing the issues?  *My*
> understanding is MB>> that, in most cases, the security patches are applied
> to the version of MB>> the app currently being distributed by RH.  This was
> certainly true with MB>> regard to the OpenSSH bugs, and I'm fairly sure
> that philosophy is true MB>> with Apache...there were a number of updates
> released for it, over the MB>> last few months.
> MB>
> MB>Are they? I suppose it is possible as I inexplicably find openssh-3.1p1
> MB>RPM's in updates.redhat.com. Not that I doubt you, but I would like to
> MB>see some page somewhere that says so. Likewise I'd like to see the page,
> MB>dated in August that lets us all know that they patched apache1.3.26 to
> MB>fix that vulnerability and it's now available for download.
> MB>
> MB>If they are doing as you say, why the advisory that I posted earlier?
> MB>Reading it it certainly doesn't say anything about "pull down the
> MB>apache-1.3.26-2.rpm", but it does say to apply immeadiately the updates
> MB>for 1.3.27 (which did not ship with 7.2, or 7.3).
>
> Psyche: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh8-errata.html
> Valhalla: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh73-errata.html
> Enigma: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh72-errata.html
> Seawolf: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh71-errata.html
>
> - --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], RHCE
> Instructor, Global Learning Services
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE9+goGYCtDlaj78K8RAtelAKCGsC8ApD1LZFUZo1VNIsnMGW0CMQCdF98M
> kxmxCqf3MPP1kF0E+SzIAHA=
> =1RdQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to