-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ezra Nugroho wrote:
>If bandwith consumption is the main issue, not snipping the original when >replying (like what I don't do in this email) is what you ought to be >concern with. >This junk bellow is definitelly larger than 13 bytes. budda-bing. ;-) I think there are far greater offenders than a subject line banner in this regard. I dislike them merely for their clutter, so I'm in agreement with Trond and others. This is what custom headers are for. But I don't think bandwidth consumption is a valid argument, especially since the string contained in the List-Id header is far longer than the one the OP was requesting in the subject header! - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPF7Yg79BpdPKTBGtEQJ/iACfW0G+Hbn20zHM0/jsJZTXtJF0nZUAninw MRjHZvuRx8IqUJtmsfO5qnfJ =SNxu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
