Yeah, I was warned that this would be a touchy issue.... I did set some filters, but once they are in my trash box, I cannot sort them anymore. That's fine guys, it's my problem, not yours.
If bandwith consumption is the main issue, not snipping the original when replying (like what I don't do in this email) is what you ought to be concern with. This junk bellow is definitelly larger than 13 bytes. At 12:12 PM 2/4/2002 -0600, you wrote: >On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:09:33PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote: > > Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members, > > > > I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct > > prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title. > > Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially > trash), so > > that we can easily delete the old redhat stuff but still keep old > > personal/other mails. > >It sounds like you would to increase the size of every message by 13 bytes. >Multiple that by the number of subscribers of this list and by the number of >messages per day, and again by the number of servers that archive every >message, and you'll see how your "minor" recommendation can increase the stock >values of the network and storage vendors. > >I have the following procmail rule that files all my redhat-list messages into >its own folder which I then read via IMAP: > >:0: >* ^Sender: redhat-list-admin >redhat-list > > > What do you think? > >Like you need a new MUA :-). What I do with procmail can be done with any >decent (and probably some poor) MUAs. procmail is available on your Red Hat >CDs. > >-- >Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >_______________________________________________ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list Ezra Nugroho Web/Database Application Specialist Goshen College ITS Phone: (574) 535-7706 _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
