Mike,

  I'll take a minute on this -- I love bashing idiocy;-).  But 
no idiocy on your part, M$'.

> How much of what they say is true?

  Ignorance it a big issue.  While Wu-ftp's had problems, may 
still have (I don't use or pay any attention to it), the rep's a 
bozo.  He makes numerous comments on things he knows little 
about.

> They are obviously taking great delight about the issue but
> how much is just MS properganda meant to divert the public
>eye from Code Red etc?

  Heh.  This doesn't look official, so it's just the inaties of 
a raving M$ employee.

> Am I right in reading that this Email was sent by MS to their
> customers?  If so, are all their communications so
> unprofessional and badly written, let alone, so unethical?

  No.  Official docs, press releases, etc look official.  This, 
IIRC, was an e-mail sent to specific customers by an employee.

> Did RedHat act badly by releasing information and a patch
> before others?

  Again, it wasn't M$, perse.  It was an employee.  But I did 
find it amusing in light of the fact they are pushing to keep 
security holes secret till they release a fix for them.

> I pressume that the fuss is about Security Advisory -
> RHSA-2001:157-06, if so I am grateful to RH for alerting me
> (that is, after all, why we subscribe to the alerts list) and
> allowing me to make an informed choice as to wether my system
> is at risk.  My view (opinion only) , if MS and other
> developers know about the problem then so do the crackers, why
> wait.

  Uh, I think I lost you on this.  "Why wait"?  Huh?

> I really do not know much about the IT world, but my
> experience is that MS and MS products are dishonest (the box
> looks great ...) and that Linux is an 'honest' concept.  As a
> customer I demand Honesty from products and vendors, MS do not
> fit that bill (,Bill).  RH do, however.

  Honesty is a matter of perspective.  Ask any marketing person 
about it, & they'll tell you they're ~always~ honest.  RH too 
leaves things out about compatability, why shouldn't anyone 
else?  What matters is, M$ has, throughout their history, lied & 
cheated to get where they are.  I don't agree with it, but it's 
done everywhere by most any company.  What's more, though 
employees are officially representatives of the company for 
which they work -- the company will disavouw any knowledge of 
any act of an employee which may hurt the reputation of the 
company.

  At any rate, if this e-mail winds up in print & it gets back 
to management at M$, it's likely that employee will be looking 
for a job soon.

  Meph

-- 
  "I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody."
  -Dave '-ddt->' Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to