I read that fluff piece once, too.

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Paul Anderson wrote:

> Actually NT's Internals are almost identical to VMS.
>
> Paul Anderson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Silviu Cojocaru
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux and viruses
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, 04:47 -0000 Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > Statux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > > That's why M$ win stinks...
> > >
> > > Well.. it's DOS. Windows runs under DOS. Even NT found much
> > of its
> > > rooting in DOS. The emulation doesn't help much either :)
> >
> > Actually, NT has its roots in OS/2.  The very essence of the
> > kernel is the OS/2 kernel.  At least they held on to
> > something from their partnership with IBM in the 80s.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, NTFS also derives from OS/2's HPFS.
>
> --
> Silviu Cojocaru
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> __
> Staff meeting in the conference room in %d minutes.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to