Ok. That's it. You all have convinced me to order this:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/things/31fb.html
On 4 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Date: 04 Feb 2001 00:40:27 -0800
> From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: How to Setup Tcpdump to nail x-girlfriend?
>
> "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > > >>No need for deep analysis. Your tools aren't up to it anyway.
> > >
> > > Harry, are you telling on yourself? (which might explain #1 above)
> > >
> > > Look, I made it clear this woman was a witch right from jump street.
> > > I've never seen anything like it. At first she started out as some
> > > sex kitten, but before I knew it, she's getting a breast reduction-!?
> > > Now, I admit- unlike you- I've known a lot women, but that gives
> > > new meaning and dimension to the term: "houchie bixch"
>
> Admittedly humorous but is it something we need to concern ourselves
> with here. You're personal relationships with women and your need to
> spy on them?
>
> > > I didn't know trying to take a quick peek at what is essentially post
>
> Perpetrators of sleasy and unethical conduct always say they `didn't
> know'. Hard to believe that snooping in some one elses email seems like
> common acceptable activity to you.
>
> > > card communicae's was illegal. Regardless, I asked the question in a
> > > direct forthright manner. No big deal. But, Harold, why try get all
>
> Your bogus name doesn't see all the forthright to me.. Feel free
> to use a real name here.
>
> Have you still not noticed that `handles' aren't that common here. This
> mailgroup is not designed for dealing with your personal relationships.
>
> > > the others, the innocent ones, all worked up. Look, I'm sure there
> > > are quite a few others that would like some sense as to how it is
> > > done...just out of intellectual curiosity if nothing else.
>
> The psuedo direct manner is exactly what is out of place here. I hope
> instructions for privacy invasion are something most people would know
> not to ask here. This kind of messy bs belongs on Judge Judy .. not here.
>
> > > Harold, you have to help me stop her.
>
> Who is Harold?
>
> > >
> > I have to admit, I have had a few good laughs with this thread. But all
> > in all, I have to admit I agree with Harold. Helping you in this case
> > would be unethical. You would also be a shacky legal ground if you did
> > read her mail. It has more in common with a wire tap, then it does with
> > taking a peek at a postcard. (Taking a peek at a postcard can also get
> > you in trouble, depending on where the card is.)
> >
> > The best part of all this is that intercepting the mail in no harder
> > then taping a phone line. The information is out there, you just have
> > to dig for it...
>
>
> There you go PHD ... Do you notice no one is jumping in with the
> advice you seek. If you conduct yourself in an ethical way in your
> dealings with people you won't have need of sleasy aids. You need to
> leave this woman alone and pursue your career as a standup comedian.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
