Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> goes on and on:
<snip>
Harry, obviously you're fairly bright, but it's apparent you haven't
had much experience with women. All I did was ask one stupid question-
and like my X- and you start with this old fish wife routine.
>>No need for deep analysis. Your tools aren't up to it anyway.
Harry, are you telling on yourself? (which might explain #1 above)
Look, I made it clear this woman was a witch right from jump street.
I've never seen anything like it. At first she started out as some
sex kitten, but before I knew it, she's getting a breast reduction-!?
Now, I admit- unlike you- I've known a lot women, but that gives
new meaning and dimension to the term: "houchie bixch"
I didn't know trying to take a quick peek at what is essentially post
card communicae's was illegal. Regardless, I asked the question in a
direct forthright manner. No big deal. But, Harold, why try get all
the others, the innocent ones, all worked up. Look, I'm sure there
are quite a few others that would like some sense as to how it is
done...just out of intellectual curiosity if nothing else.
<snipped more minutiae>
>>Maybe you'll notice that no one has felt a need to share or defend
>>your views on this, and further that there is a fairly high ethical
>>standard on this list. Not a rule or anything that tangible. But
>>present non the less .. ethics is part of the linux community at large.
Now, I know you're just making things up as you go. See what trouble
that woman has caused- she's even soiled the Red Hat list. Somehow,
Harold, you have to help me stop her.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
