"Joseph R. Erlewein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for pulling the discussion hard to _that_ direction. I'll not stoop
> to that level.
[...]
> Do you mean "pedophile?"
If you have to stoop for `nitwit' you'll have to go subterranean to
find the words I wanted to and should have used to describe the silly
and possilby dangerous ideas in your post.
> Not knowing that info makes it hard to post it. My point was, I wouldn't
Yet you felt it appropriate to post `something'.
> care, even in this situation, and still wouldn't make a huge fuss about
> the morality of it all. Bad things happen every day, and in the end it's
> still up to the person that does the bad thing.
Your` advanced spelling prowess' is a good bit better than your logic
I'm afraid:
Lets see now, we have:
1) Bad things happen ever day
Therefore, whether or not I post directions expressly to help
invade someones privacy is up to the person who asks for the
directions.
Joeseph, maybe you should stick with the spelling.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list