"Joseph R. Erlewein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thanks for pulling the discussion hard to _that_ direction. I'll not stoop
> to that level.

[...]

> Do you mean "pedophile?"

If you have to stoop for `nitwit' you'll have to go subterranean to
find the words I wanted to and should have used to describe the silly
and possilby dangerous ideas in your post.

> Not knowing that info makes it hard to post it. My point was, I wouldn't

Yet you felt it appropriate to post `something'.

> care, even in this situation, and still wouldn't make a huge fuss about
> the morality of it all. Bad things happen every day, and in the end it's
> still up to the person that does the bad thing.

Your` advanced spelling prowess' is a good bit better than your logic
I'm afraid:

Lets see now, we have:
        1) Bad things happen ever day

        Therefore, whether or not I post directions expressly to help
        invade someones privacy is up to the person who asks for the
        directions.

Joeseph,  maybe you should stick with the spelling.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to