> I wouldn't care too much about being denied further access to > these lists (no offense to anyone...) but being denied free > access to bug and security patches is rather scary. I'm saying > that we *might* have to pay for access to their > ftp://updates.redhat.com. I guess I don't get it. I thought the GPL implied that all changes had to be made publicly available at no cost. This does not mean that they can not charge, but that they would also have to make it publically available for free. Am I wrong. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: [Final with i686 optimization] Building ... John Aldrich
- RE: Building RPMs from SRC.RPMs??? Juha Saarinen
- RE: Building RPMs from SRC.RPMs??? Jonathan Wilson
- Odd odd ethernet problem ben
- Re: Odd odd ethernet problem Rob Tanner
- Re: Odd odd ethernet problem Gordon Messmer
- Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service'?? Luke C Gavel
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service'?? Hal Burgiss
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service'?? Luke C Gavel
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service... Gordon Messmer
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service... Chad W. Skinner
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service'?? Jason Costomiris
- Re: Yikes! RH 'Subscription Service'?? John Aldrich
- Re: Building RPMs from SRC.RPMs??? Giulio Orsero