yup, got 2.1.3.
would it be worth upgrading from 2.1 to 2.2?
from what i read these libs are more or less the base libs for linux
do i even want to mess with doing this??
thank you
eric
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, eric clover wrote:
>
> > hello,
> > just wondering if someone can see something i am not seeing.
> > trying to upgrade my hdparm and i get this error, also posted is the
results
> > of a find:
> >
> > [root@xxx installs]# rpm -Uvh hdparm-3.9-6.i386.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by hdparm-3.9-6
> > [root@xxx installs]# find /lib -name libc.so.6
> > /lib/libc.so.6
> >
> > something im missing???
> > thank you
> > eric
> >
>
> What do you get when you do this?:
>
> [jortega@www jortega]$ rpm -qi glibc
>
> This is the output in my Red Hat 6.2 box:
>
> Name : glibc Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.1.3 Vendor: RedHat, Inc.
> Release : 15 Build Date: Tue 29 Feb 2000 04:00:05 PM
CST
>
> That other package seems to require glibc 2.2, not 2.1.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
