Dumb question, Why would he run both? Don't both do the same job?? Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 6:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FAT32 > > > On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, CH wrote: > > I am using default kernel when I install. I am using RH6.2. > The installer > > automatically > > mount FAT16 when I name the mount point to FAT16 as /win. > Actually it was > > RH6.0 > > when I tried FAT32. I do not really remember if I tried it on 6.2 but I > > tried it afterward. > > I guess that may be the problem. Sorry. By the way I am still learning > > what to do and > > not to do in Linux. I installed and upgraded several progs but > never have > > tried the > > Kernel compilation nor upgrade yet. > > > Well, I don't have any Fat32 drives in this system at home, > but at work I'm running RedHat 6.2 and have a couple Fat32 > drives. I've been able to access those drives since > Mandrake 5.3 (I later upgraded to RedHat 6.0 and then to > RedHat 6.2) so I think it may be that you didn't select > FAT32 support when installing or something, 'cause you > shouldn't have any trouble with Fat32. > > Can you post your /etc/fstab here for us? Also, do you have > AMD and AUTOFS running? If not, maybe you should consider > running them? > John > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. > -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
