I'm beginning to wonder... (was: What else did RH6.1 install forget....)

[Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)]

On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 11:49:32PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
[...]
> with 6.1 custom.  I believed that the 6.1 installation would provide the
> same level of installation support as 6.0 did.  Mistake #4.
[...]

Ok, in fairness to Vidiot, there have been more than his mails about the
RHL 6.1 installer on this list. I will not judge any of them right now
and I do not have tried 6.1 myself (until now I avoided x.0 and x.1
releases from Red Hat... Hence, I'm still on 5.2) so I can't judge the
installer itself, but I am beginning to wonder whether such a seemingly
big change as an installer change was a good thing to do on a minor
version change. I can at least understand how one could be led to expect
similar behaviour from an x.1 installer with regard to the x.0. I myself
was actually surprised to learn (from this list) that 6.1 was so much
different in this regard from 6.0 - that's something I'd have expected
from a move to 7.0. But maybe that's just me - how do other people think
about this?

My EUR0.02,

Thomas
-- 
             "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"

     Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.