Try XFCE, is nice, functional, configurable, and very fast
----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:51 AM Subject: Re: Why is RH9 slower than Windows98SE. Any advice? > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote: > > > So... I intalled RH9.0 and all the workstations are so much slower, all > > RH9 is dog-slow out of the box. Most of the blame probably belongs to > KDE/GNOME, though. I dumped them in favor of TWM, and my system now runs > faster than it did running 8.0. > > KDE seems to use an inordinate amount of memory/swap/CPU switching between > virtual desktops, and GNOME 2 uses Nautilus, which is a real memory pig > AND a slow-poke to boot. Try a different window manager without a desktop > environment, and see if that solves the problem for you. > > -- > The DMCA is anti-consumer. The RIAA has no right to rewrite copyright > laws to suit themselves. > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
