The only reason why you knock windows is because it is the domoninat operating system and you just cant afford it. So take your no job ass and go and download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:38:42 -0500 (EST)
Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer that is not bottable from CD?
You need no less than 6 floppies. AND, Windows doesn't check to see if your system meets minimum specs until the last floppy. AND, I couldn't find the program to make the floppies anywhere on the CD. I had to go out to MS's web site to get it... No fun.
> On Wednesday 26 March 2003 02:03 pm, Cliff Wells wrote: > > I am going to agree with you to disagree with any argument that Windows > is easier to install... > > My last experience installing Windows is just a frustrating attempt. Try > to count how many times a Win machine has to reboot after install > before you can use it... > "found a new hardware.. video card" -- reboot after installing driver > before win can use it > "found a new hardware.. sound card" -- reboot > "found a new hardware.. plug and play monitor" -- reboot > "found a new hardware.. network card" -- reboot > > and then.. > "change display resolution" -- reboot > "install a program" -- reboot > > WTH?? > ....... > > and try install linux. Reboot *once* after install and that's it. > > IE has better support for CSS? Where do you hear that from??? Mozilla > support for *standard* HTML and CSS is far better than IE, no question > about that.
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
