On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:16, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > types, a web browser that does really support css and xslt/xml stuff > > properly > > and has a horrible security history. As for CSS, I'm no expert, but I > *have* heard the same story the other way round as well. Problem for > me is to figure out which one is true. > In addition, Mozilla has - AFAIK - more features (pop-up filter, tabs > - all stuff that IE didn't have or still doesn't have). >
Check out some demos at http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/ with both IE and mozilla and you will see why moz is better at CSS/CSS2 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
