Scott Drake wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:40:01 -0500, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
>
> >>So, the question is: Can I install RH 5.0 without glibc ?
> >>I just want libc-5.
> >>Can I remove glibc now and have just libc-5 ?
> >
> >Nope. Every bin on a RH5.0 system (minus a very small number) is linked
> >against glibc. If you want a libc5 system, then you should just use RH 4.2
> >and not even think about 5.0
>
> So what you are saying Mike is that anyone who purchased RH 5.0 and needs
> to compile libc5 programs WASTED their Hard Earned Money on it since RH
> 5.0 will not compile libc5 programs?
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Drake
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, the truth is that I do feel that I wasted the $50, and I am
disappointed.
I should have bought the 4.2 distribution, if at all (I have 4.1).
What are the differences between 4.1 and 4.2 ?
Thanks, Adoram
--
|----------------------------------------------------|
| Adoram Rogel email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 |
| 1740, Union st.,#1 Fax: (518) 374-7760 |
| Niskayuna, N.Y. 12309 Home: (518) 374-9241 |
|----* Linux - The choice of the GNU generation *----|
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
