At 07:34 AM 3/7/98 -0700, you wrote:
>School me oh guru, why then would you need it if the core portion of Win95
>is 16, yes 16, and NOT 32 bit?
Surely this is a weak attempt at trolling! My car's engine has eight
cylinders, so how can I drive home from the market with a dozen eggs?
>
>On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Fred Viles wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 98 at 22:37, Paul Fontenot wrote about
>> "Re: FAT32":
>>
>> } And the difference would be?
>>
>> The main difference would be that fat32 uses 32-bit cluster numbers,
>> while vfat, like msdos, uses 16-bit cluster numbers. Another
>> difference is that fat32 support is not available in stock 2.0.x
>> kernels (or Win95 versions other than OSR2).
>>
>> Does that make it clearer?
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
