School me oh guru, why then would you need it if the core portion of Win95
is 16, yes 16, and NOT 32 bit?
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Fred Viles wrote:
> On 6 Mar 98 at 22:37, Paul Fontenot wrote about
> "Re: FAT32":
>
> } And the difference would be?
>
> The main difference would be that fat32 uses 32-bit cluster numbers,
> while vfat, like msdos, uses 16-bit cluster numbers. Another
> difference is that fat32 support is not available in stock 2.0.x
> kernels (or Win95 versions other than OSR2).
>
> Does that make it clearer?
>
> } On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, John Higginbotham wrote:
> }
> } > At 10:14 PM 3/6/98 -0700, you wrote:
> } > >Thats' odd, I mount Win95 with: 'mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dosc/'
> } >
> } > That's vfat, not fat32.
> }...
>
> - Fred Viles (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
