_Internally_, sure it was.  From a users or administrative position
(after the initial install/config), not in the least.  And that's a
sign that RedHat did a good job with the conversion.


On 23 Apr 98, Derek Balling wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Marco Shaw wrote:
> 
> > I'm not looking for trouble here....but I didn't see much difference between
> > 4.2 to 5, so I don't expect much of a difference from 5 to 5.1.  I was the
> > one that brought up this subject last week...out of curiosity...and being a
> > little bored.
> 
> What?!! You didn't think the whole conversion to glibc was "much
> difference"?????
>  
> ======================================================================
> Derek J. Balling          | "Bill Gates is a monocle and a white 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |  fluffy cat from being a villain in the
> http://www.megacity.org/  |  next Bond film."  - Dennis Miller
> ======================================================================
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------
 Andrew Burton, R&K Engineering Inc. Roanoke, VA
 http://www.rkeng.com     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to