On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:50:13AM -0700, Tim Howe wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:55:22 +0200 > Simon Dassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I absolutly disagree with you removing the tk flavor and making > > > tk and tcl a dependency. This makes ruby REQUIRE X11 to be intalled. > > > Which is totally ridiculous. Why should I have to install x11 to run > > > a ruby app ? > > > > I totally agree with Mathieu. > > Another issue: the license switch, why? Ruby is still GPLed as seen on > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt > > Besides that, it builds on a 3.8-beta i386, tests on current follow if > > tcl/tk is a flavor again (machine without x11). > > Yeah, I think that the tk libs may only be looked for at runtime, not > compile > time. I'm not sure how clean/clear that would perceived as in the ports > tree...
Hmm... i commented out the depends et voila, builds on current sparc64 without x. The files are there, but unused... what about subpackaging those ruby extensions with depencies? Regards Simon
