On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Simon Dassow wrote: > without x). > > > > sparc64 without x. The files are there, but unused... what about > > > subpackaging those ruby extensions with depencies? > > > > First, i would like to update ruby in the tree so other people could > > work on extensions such as Ruby on Rails or Ruby Gems that need 1.8.3 to > > run properly. > > Get it in so we can fix the remaining issues... (x, licences etc).
NO. This update shouldn't go in until the issues are resolved. I have a better patch in the works that fix the X11 issues. I'll be posting it a little later. -- Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
