On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:54:24PM +0200, Damien Couderc wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:02:16 +0200 > Simon Dassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hmm... i commented out the depends et voila, builds on current > > This is not clean enough for the ports tree. It works for you because > you don't have TK installed but could fail on the systems that will > build packages if they already have TK.
Surely not clean... and it doesn't needs to... as an example (for ruby without x). > > sparc64 without x. The files are there, but unused... what about > > subpackaging those ruby extensions with depencies? > > First, i would like to update ruby in the tree so other people could > work on extensions such as Ruby on Rails or Ruby Gems that need 1.8.3 to > run properly. Get it in so we can fix the remaining issues... (x, licences etc). Regards Simon
