On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:02:16 +0200 Simon Dassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... i commented out the depends et voila, builds on current This is not clean enough for the ports tree. It works for you because you don't have TK installed but could fail on the systems that will build packages if they already have TK. > sparc64 without x. The files are there, but unused... what about > subpackaging those ruby extensions with depencies? First, i would like to update ruby in the tree so other people could work on extensions such as Ruby on Rails or Ruby Gems that need 1.8.3 to run properly. Damien
