I bet she'll like it even more in 25 years. "Look how perfect my skin
was when we were married." She'll come to accept it as real. Which
will make her happy, and that's what it's all about. The fact that no
one in their right mind will mistake it for art is irrelevant.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Bob W wrote:
I wonder how they'll feel about them in 25 years.
Bob
"Repulsed" is a strong word... I think it's cheesy and
stupid, but if
SHE likes it... Well she's getting what she wants; and more to the
point what she paid for. And that's the job of the photographer: to
give the client what he or she is buying.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
Boris Liberman wrote:
Bruce, my immediate reaction was - why don't I see the pointy ears?
Honestly, however, I feel repulsed by this kind of
processing. It is
good though that I married back in 1998 whereas my wedding
photos were
made on film.
Boris
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Here is an example of some of what we are seeing in the wedding
world. Do you like it? How long would it take per photo to make
this kind of change?
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8420492&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
