Determining and accepting quality issues is the problem. Negative perceptions of image issues are often difficult to convey to others. Especially those who are in a "prove it" position. Blatant image or operational issues are a different matter.
Jack --- John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So it's been widely reported that there have been some quality > issues with > > DA* 16-50 F2.8 lenses. Can anyone on the list report how well (or > not) > > Pentax USA has been dealing with the issue? If you get a bum copy, > does > > Pentax USA fix it under warranty? Or is buying one a roll of the > dice? > > Isn't that a silly question? If you bought a defective lens, why > wouldn't > the manufacturer fix it under warranty? Barring any post-purchase > butterfingerness by the end user, I can't see why Pentax or any other > > manufacturer might go against their own warranty. > > I have not heard of any quality issues with the lens, by the way. > Everyone > I know who owns one has been immensely happy with it. > > John > > -- > http://www.neovenator.com > http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
