I agree. But in terms of retail exposure, it's gotten much better for  
Pentax in the last six months. You couldn't find a Pentax *ist camera  
in any of the local camera stores. But since the introduction of the  
K series, they've been in the display cases. Now they're beginning to  
be featured prominently. I don't know if this is happening  
everywhere, but it's certainly obvious here in Michigan.
Paul
On May 10, 2007, at 11:12 PM, William Robb wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
>
>
>> But they're also well made and reasonably priced. The K10D is a
>> genuine bargain given its build and feature set. That works for me. I
>> don't need to be right at the bleeding edge.
>
> It works for me also. I shoot Pentax for the lenses, not the cameras.
> Having said this, if one needs the feature set of a high end Canon  
> to do
> what he wants, then this brand isn't appealing. On the consumer  
> side, if one
> wants the cachet value of a higher end body, either in ones camera  
> bag or
> not, then this is not the brand to buy.
> I think what happens (this is from my retail experience, so is more
> anecdotal than factual), is that companies like Canon or Nikon can  
> advertise
> trememdous bragging rights about what their equipment can do.
> This puts them at the front of the lower end camera consumers short  
> list,
> and often the consumer will give a Pentax little or no heed, simply  
> because
> they aren't in the pissing contest.
> It's probably gotten worse since the advent of internet and big box
> retailing, since now the consumer quite often doesn't talk to a  
> knowledgable
> sales person before making a buying decision, and if they happen to  
> find
> themselves on a forum such as DPReview, they will generally get the
> Nikon/Canon party line fed to them.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to