The A* was an f1.4.  Boz's site makes no mention of an A 1.8.

Thibouille wrote:
> Very interesting, William.
> Specially the difference of rendering of bokeh at f/2 and f/4.
> A pity this lens is not of A-type. I'm sure the A version (f/1.8 if I
> remember well) is way more expensive. (I don't even wanna know
> aboutthe FA f/1.4).
>
> A pity; I'd really like to play with one of those.
>
> 2007/4/26, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>   
>> A few days ago, Thibouille was asking about the bokeh of the M85 f2 lens. My
>> recollection was that it was as smooth as silk, but I hadn't really used it
>> recently, favouring the 77mm lens instead.
>> I decided to pull the 85 off the shelf to remind myself of how much I
>> enjoyed it's rendering abilities.
>> Here then is a couple of shots taken with the M85/2, one shot wide open, and
>> a similar shot taken at f/4.
>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/m852bokeh/852bokeh.html
>> It is as smooth as I remember.
>>
>> Camera info:
>> K10, ISO100.
>>
>> William Robb
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to