Paul Stenquist wrote: >On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Ever used the 165/2.8? I've been thinking of getting a 67 and that's a >> lens I'm interested in (as I think it might also be useful on the 645 >> if I ever find a 67-645 adapter). >> >I love the 165LS. If you do any outdoor portraiture, it's worth it's >weight in gold, just for the high-speed synch. But it's also a great >optic. I'm also quite fond of the 300/4.
I'm interested in the 165 (or is it 160?) f/2.8, not the 165/4 leaf shutter lens. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
