I love the 165LS. If you do any outdoor portraiture, it's worth it's weight in gold, just for the high-speed synch. But it's also a great optic. I'm also quite fond of the 300/4. Paul On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> William Robb wrote: > >> I forgot to mention, the 165 LS is an excellent lens. > > Ever used the 165/2.8? I've been thinking of getting a 67 and that's a > lens I'm interested in (as I think it might also be useful on the 645 > if I ever find a 67-645 adapter). > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
