I tried the tubes with the 90 leaf. Nothing to write home about, but decent
Dave Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Johnson" > Subject: I got a 67ii > > >> Well I will soon be the proud owner of a 67II, the question I have now >> is what lenses to get I'm thinking the 45mm a 100mm macro and the 165 >> LS would make quite a good set up but Ive heard mixed things about >> the 100 macro and 165 ls 4.0 so any opinions would be apreciated. > > I don't know much about the 100macro, but if you are thinking of doing > macro with a 6x7, I suggest thinking about something else. > It's kinda/sorta doable, but it isn't pretty. > I'd just get the 105/2.4 instead. > FWIW, I have the 135/4 macro, and extension tubes, and the 6x7 bellows. > >> >> My biggest concern is what tripod to get I want to make sure to get >> one heavy enough to counter-act any shutter shake but I'm a student >> and i wanna make sure to get the best bang for my dollar. I've tried >> reading around online but haven't seen anything that would help me >> pick out the right tripod and head for the money, all I have seen is a >> variety of pro tripods people said didnt eliminate the shake. SO any >> 67 users your input on this would be greatly helpful. > > I used a Manfrotto 055 for a long time under the 6x7. I always thought > it was a bit light weight though. > Vibration is NOT a problem with the 6x7 providing you use half a brain > when shooting, and don't try to balance the camera on a toy tripod. > Use the mirror lock whenever possible. > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
