You are an illogical ( read that as STUPID ) twit. You cant say that pros need new lenses for Better automation and at the same time say The the only exposure automation the K/M lenses can provide Isnt needed by pros and that's exactly what You argued. Idiotic argument by any standards. Learn to make some sense and you wont be called Full of shit quite so often.
jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:01 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey Try learning how to read and understand sometime. Far as I'm concerned, any attempt to explain anything to you is like trying to instruct a dung beetle how to do higher mathematics. My statement says the following: "The automation available for the non-electronic lenses with current DSLR bodies is satisfactory for the limited uses that a professional expects from them." Now shut up, fuckface. G On Oct 19, 2006, at 11:15 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > You are contradicting yourself. On one hand you > Say that "pros" want and or need automation like > AF or quickshift but on the other hand you say > They don't need the automation that K/M lenses > Can provide and has been left of the recent > DSLR cameras. This, IMHO, makes you full of shit! > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Godfrey DiGiorgi > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:42 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:17 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> There is one thing I don't understand about your "pro" >> Statement, to pros, cameras are just tools. ... > > Yes, to a professional photographer, cameras are just tools. One > changes one's tools as time progresses to obtain the best advantage > for the work at hand. Most professional shooters will prefer to move > to the latest glass to take advantage of improvements in lens design > and coatings, as well as other features like AF and QuickShift, > rather than harboring an large collection of ancient lenses that pose > no real advantage to their work. They don't become "attached" > emotionally to the equipment or a single way of working. > > For my needs as a professional photographer, the amount of backwards > compatibility provided by Pentax is more than adequate. For the > extremely few, unique lenses that I might desire despite how old they > are, the current setup works satisfactorily for anything I might > consider doing with them. > > Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
