On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:27 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs > Is not something impossible like FD or M42 > DSLRS which use totally different very old lens > Mount. Why are you so sure its gone forever? I suspect it may be to do with two qualities you appear to lack: intelligence and common sense. > Its too early to tell because pentax hasn't > Really put out a high end DSLR like canon's > Top models. And when they do put out a high-end model without the simulator, will you then accept reality, or will you continue to infest the list with your stupid whingeing? John > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:15 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: The JCO survey > > >> Eos INTRO 20 yrs ago, there were no digital cameras >> In sight at that time. Expecting Canon to make now >> A digital FD body is a little ridiculous isnt it? > > Absolutely, they have well and truly screwed the FD lens owners at this > pooint. There's no going back. > >> Its like asking pentax to make a M42 screwmount DSLR. > > Truthfully, it's like asking Pentax to put an aperture cam follower onto > > a DSLR. The big difference between Canon and Pentax regarding this is > that it's recent history with Pentax. > That and they didn't make it impossible to use K/M lenses. > Thats a big plus, especially considering that their intention with the > istD was to pretty much ignore K/M lenses as obsolete. > The aperture simulator is gone. Get over it. > > William Robb > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
