----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" Subject: Re: Interview w/Pentax exec
> First, what do you see wrong? Tonality and detail are the biggies that jump out at me when looking at a print made from the DSLR. > > It seems to me that if the ideal format for landscapes is some large > format > (4x5, 5x7) then the digital equivalent should also be a format > substantially larger than APS-C or perhaps even 645. I've seen some > gorgeous work made with larger format digi backs. > I'm sure that you have, but there is also a cost factor at play. If the equipment is so expensive as to be unavailable or unrealistically un cost effective, then it is, effectively, unavailable. How was the shadow detail in the Zone II and Zone II range? My experience so far is that this is where digital falls flat. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
