Nothing you've written here was not fully understood by everyone. The idea was to share feelings, choices and preferences that relate to photography. A brisk exchange that should be encouraged rather than belittled as trite and unworthy of discussion. >From my take on your past contributions, it surprises me that your mood is so contrary and critical of a variety of well meant and in some cases, reluctant, less than confident and secure contributors.
Jack --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frankly, this whole argument is a waste of time. > > You want prints? Print your pictures. It doesn't matter what medium > you've got. > You want to use film? Use it. > You prefer digital? Good for you. > > There's nothing to prove or argue one way or another. Nothing was > "rammed down my throat". I was not "sold a bill of goods". I worked > with film for the better part of four decades because it was all > there was, realistically speaking. Now I'm working with new cameras > that are more capable for my purposes. > > Most of the people I know who used to shoot a roll of film or two per > > year have purchased digital cameras and now make many more, and > better, photographs than they used to. Some print them, some keep > them on their computers. That includes my 83 year old mother. They're > > happier with the number of pictures they see now. So be it. > > If the digital cameras today don't suit you, or your grandmother, use > > a film camera and enjoy it. It won't affect what I do. I'll do what I > > need to, with either film or sensor, to make the photographs I want > to now and in the future. > > So much ado over fookin' nothin'. > > Godfrey > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
