Ditto. If I was shooting what Aaron or Cotty shoot on a daily basis, I'd be shooting JPEG or RAW+JPEG. And probably just JPEG's. I shoot RAW because I have the time and I do extensive exposure correction at a minimum (Mostly to preserve shadow detail by exposing to the right on the histogram, which preserves more shadow detail than the correct exposure, but causes me to edit extensively in the RAW converter)
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: >Well said. Several people here have demonstrated that one can be >successful shooting jpegs. In addition to Aaron, whose baseball work is >outstanding, I can think of Ken Waller and Cotty. I'm sure others have >also done well working this way. >Paul >On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > >>You keep making these blanket statements. Have you seen Aaron's work? >> I >>have, and it's quite good - better, in fact, for its purpose, than the >>work >>of a lot of people here shooting RAW. >> >>JPEG's don't suck when used in an intelligent manner and for the >>purpose >>for which they're intended. Because it doesn't work for you doesn't >>mean >>they won't work, and work well, for someone else. >> >>Shel >> >> >> >> >> >>>[Original Message] >>>From: Jens Bladt >>> >>> >>>JPEG's suck. The quality simply isn't good enough for what I need. >>> >>> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
