Jens, I don't think that many would argue what you've written below. But it's quite different from your statement that started the ruckus -- that users of digital are either uncritical of the results or spend a lot of time on post-production. This is only true if you're not shooting optimally.
Likewise, I challenge your blanket "jpegs suck" statement. They suck IF you make bad exposure choices, yes. Aside from their appropriateness for radical exposure changes, which I agree that they're no good for, what problems do you have with jpegs? -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> But for the average P&S or family album photographer, film is surely the easiest way to go. And film will - unless you spend a lot of time and money catching up on RAW conversion, colour profiles, Photoshop etc. - produce better results. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
