I've read some good 17-35 tests in magazines I tend to trust (tests based on objective measurements and practical use). This does not help you much, I know.
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Genovese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 8. april 2006 09:37 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Opinions solicited > > Hi what's the general consensus regarding the quality/performance of > > Tamron's 17-35 or as it is officially known: > > SPAF17-35MM F/2.8-4 Di LD Asph (IF) > > http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/17_35mm.asp > > how would it compare to say a Pentax 20-35 f/4 > or a pentax fa20 f/2.8 > > I know that's not comparing like with like but the thing is I was > about to buy a 20 2.8 and got thinking whether the Tamron would be a > wiser choice ? > > Regards > > Patrick Genovese >
