Don,
If you use a table, the pictures and labels will format correctly
regardless of what screen size they're displayed on. Replace the text
in Compare.html for a better display:
=====
<html>
<head>
<DEFANGED_meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1">
<DEFANGED_meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express 2.0">
<title>quickie resolution test</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#000000" text="#C0C0C0">
<table>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/DA50_200.jpg"
width="326" height="549"></td>
<td><img src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FA28_70.jpg"
width="320" height="544"></td>
<td><img src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FA24_90.jpg"
width="324" height="547"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><center>
<font color="#FFFFFF">DA 50-200/4-5.6</font>
</center></td>
<td><center>
<font color="#FFFFFF">FA28-70/4 AL</font>
</center></td>
<td><center>
<font color="#FFFFFF">FA24-90/3.5-4.5</font>
</center></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
=====
Godfrey
On Dec 25, 2005, at 10:09 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768 screen size.
Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 11:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
Don.
I see two targets on the top of my screen and one at the bottom left.
Are they in order of the lenses you mention below.
If so, the 24-90(bottom) looks the best to me.
Dave
Don Sanderson wrote:
Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
against each other.
FA28-70, DA50-200 and FA24-90.
The 24-90 is from a wonderful list member
who got it replaced after a brief dunk in
water. 6 hours later I had it cleaned and
on the D and _I Love It!_
Dear wonderful list member, (you know who
you are) *** Thanks!!!!! ***
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Compare.htm
Don