Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768 screen size. Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5. And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
It's not surprising to me... So, what's the surprise? I was very un-impressed with the 28-70/4 I had and I just assumes the 50-200 was a "consumer grade" lens. I "thought" the 24-90 was supposed to be a good lens...
-- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net
