RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.

Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:58:19 -0800 

Thanks Godfrey, I was just being lazy. ;-)

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 1:13 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Re: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
>
> Don,
>
> If you use a table, the pictures and labels will format correctly
> regardless of what screen size they're displayed on. Replace the text
> in Compare.html for a better display:
>
> =====
>
> <html>
>
> <head>
> <DEFANGED_meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
> charset=iso-8859-1">
> <DEFANGED_meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express 2.0">
> <title>quickie resolution test</title>
> </head>
>
> <body bgcolor="#000000" text="#C0C0C0">
>
> <table>
>       <tr>
>               <td><img
> src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/DA50_200.jpg";
> width="326" height="549"></td>
>               <td><img src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FA28_70.jpg";
> width="320" height="544"></td>
>               <td><img src="http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FA24_90.jpg";
> width="324" height="547"></td>
>       </tr>
>       <tr>
>               <td><center>
>                       <font color="#FFFFFF">DA 50-200/4-5.6</font>
>               </center></td>
>               <td><center>
>                       <font color="#FFFFFF">FA28-70/4 AL</font>
>               </center></td>
>               <td><center>
>                       <font color="#FFFFFF">FA24-90/3.5-4.5</font>
>               </center></td>
>       </tr>
> </table>
>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> =====
> Godfrey
>
> On Dec 25, 2005, at 10:09 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768 screen size.
> > Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
> > And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
> >
> > Don
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 11:44 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
> >>
> >>
> >> Don.
> >>
> >> I see two targets on the top of my screen and one at the bottom left.
> >> Are they in order of the lenses you mention below.
> >>
> >> If so, the 24-90(bottom) looks the best to me.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Don Sanderson wrote:
> >>>>> Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
> >>>>> against each other.
> >>>>> FA28-70, DA50-200 and FA24-90.
> >>>>> The 24-90 is from a wonderful list member
> >>>>> who got it replaced after a brief dunk in
> >>>>> water. 6 hours later I had it cleaned and
> >>>>> on the D and _I Love It!_
> >>>>> Dear wonderful list member, (you know who
> >>>>> you are) *** Thanks!!!!! ***
> >>
> >>>>> http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Compare.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to