I use the DA 50-200, and it's earned me quite a few dollars. It may not
be the sharpest tool in the shed wide open, but it has great flare
resistance, and it's fabulous at f8 or so. But it's greatest virtues
may well be its compact size and it's focusing clutch that allows
manual correction.
Paul
On Dec 25, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Christian wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768 screen size.
Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
It's not surprising to me... So, what's the surprise? I was very
un-impressed with the 28-70/4 I had and I just assumes the 50-200 was
a "consumer grade" lens. I "thought" the 24-90 was supposed to be a
good lens...
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
