P�l, That's like saying that any two cameras operate about the same. It is most like comparing the LX to the ZX-5n (build quality aside). The LX is manual focus, has different finders has a different feel, lenses of that era feel different, etc. Looking through the finders is different, aspect ratio is different, etc.
The 645n(ii) is geared towards automation and competes in an environment that is very progressive and competitive. It is a great system, but I strongly feel different than you that these are basically the same. I will grant you that they both have aperture rings you can turn and both have shutter speed dials, but they have a distinctly different style between them. Bruce Monday, February 24, 2003, 2:16:47 PM, you wrote: PJ> Bruce wrote: >>If you like the old style of cameras and handling then you >> might like the 67, if you like all the automation of the new cameras >> then you will probably like the 645. PJ> (snip) >>I tend to shoot more manually or aperture priority, liked >> better the style and handling of the 67ii and wanted the bigger >> negative (that's why I went to MF). PJ> I all fairness, the two camera have the same interface and handling as far as interface goes. The main difference is that the 67II has manual film wind. Otherwise the ergonomics are basically the PJ> same and using them manually or in aperture priority mode is identical on both bodies. PJ> P�l
