Not if you scan and print digitally.
JCO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Seeking advise on medium format
> 
> 
> Yeah, mine are 4x5's too. I don't really think this is a big issue,
> but for folks who like to print full frame, it might enter into the
> equation a little.
> 
> Personally, I like the ratio of 35mm the most. I've been thinking
> about a Fuji 6x9 rangefinder, but I'd have to buy a large format
> enlarger.
> 
> Argh.
> 
> --
> Thomas Van Veen Photography
> www.thomasvanveen.com
> 301-758-3085
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:19 PM
> > To: gfen
> > Subject: Re: Seeking advise on medium format
> >
> >
> > gfen,
> >
> > My proofs come back as 4X5 from the lab.  I would guess
> > that has to do
> > with lab issues, not format issues.
> >
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> > Monday, February 24, 2003, 11:53:52 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > g> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, tom wrote:
> > >> Pro 67
> > >> - big neg
> > >> - built like a big old manual focus camera of yore
> > >> - interchangeable finders
> >
> > g> Mirror lock up.
> >
> > >> Pro 645
> > >> - af
> >
> > g> Only on the newer models.
> >
> > >> - more shots per roll
> > >> - lighter as a system
> > >> - closer focusing (generally)
> > >> - takes film magazines
> > >> - takes Polaroid magazine (so does the 67, but you'd
> > have to dedicate
> > >> a body to it, I think)
> > >> - data imprinting
> >
> > g> Only on the newer models.
> > g> Pentax, and users, claime MLU not needed due to mirror brake.
> > g> Less shutter vibration/mirror slap than 67 (no matter
> > how overstated most
> > g> people may claim this is, it definatly has some bearing).
> >
> > >> - aspect ratio (67II is slightly squarer)
> >
> > g> I'm trying desperatly to remember what size my minilab
> > proofs come back
> > g> as, and I can't. All I know its not the 4x5 I expected
> > from a "ideal
> > g> format" camera, I think its 4x5.5...
> 
> 

Reply via email to