Yeah, I guess that's true. It would also be true if Mike Johnston lived in my darkroom with his Saunders 4500, but I don't think either is going to happen.
tv > -----Original Message----- > From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Seeking advise on medium format > > > Not if you scan and print digitally. > JCO > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:40 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Seeking advise on medium format > > > > > > Yeah, mine are 4x5's too. I don't really think this is a > big issue, > > but for folks who like to print full frame, it might > enter into the > > equation a little. > > > > Personally, I like the ratio of 35mm the most. I've been thinking > > about a Fuji 6x9 rangefinder, but I'd have to buy a large format > > enlarger. > > > > Argh. > > > > -- > > Thomas Van Veen Photography > > www.thomasvanveen.com > > 301-758-3085 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:19 PM > > > To: gfen > > > Subject: Re: Seeking advise on medium format > > > > > > > > > gfen, > > > > > > My proofs come back as 4X5 from the lab. I would guess > > > that has to do > > > with lab issues, not format issues. > > > > > > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, February 24, 2003, 11:53:52 AM, you wrote: > > > > > > g> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, tom wrote: > > > >> Pro 67 > > > >> - big neg > > > >> - built like a big old manual focus camera of yore > > > >> - interchangeable finders > > > > > > g> Mirror lock up. > > > > > > >> Pro 645 > > > >> - af > > > > > > g> Only on the newer models. > > > > > > >> - more shots per roll > > > >> - lighter as a system > > > >> - closer focusing (generally) > > > >> - takes film magazines > > > >> - takes Polaroid magazine (so does the 67, but you'd > > > have to dedicate > > > >> a body to it, I think) > > > >> - data imprinting > > > > > > g> Only on the newer models. > > > g> Pentax, and users, claime MLU not needed due to mirror brake. > > > g> Less shutter vibration/mirror slap than 67 (no matter > > > how overstated most > > > g> people may claim this is, it definatly has some bearing). > > > > > > >> - aspect ratio (67II is slightly squarer) > > > > > > g> I'm trying desperatly to remember what size my minilab > > > proofs come back > > > g> as, and I can't. All I know its not the 4x5 I expected > > > from a "ideal > > > g> format" camera, I think its 4x5.5... > > > > >
