On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:59:07 +0000, Duncan wrote: > "Christian Pernegger" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > bb145bd20804051151u2c084dcem3453662ab5af135-JsoAwUIsXosN [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:51:57 +0200: > >>> Meanwhile, I'd love to know if my 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, etc, idea >>> works! >> >> I imagine it would but I fail to see how that a) is better than the >> current workaround of editing /etc/hosts and adding a few more names >> for 127.0.0.1. That gives the ability to "name" servers as a byproduct. >> b) gets rid of the root-cause-bug in pan, namely that it assumes >> (somewhere) that the host is a unique identifier by itself...
That 'somewhere' is what I'd like to find out so I can start (pretending) to debug the code. Do you see anything resembling a clue when you start pan with 'pan --debug'? _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
