"Christian Pernegger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:51:57 +0200:
>> Meanwhile, I'd love to know if my 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, etc, idea >> works! > > I imagine it would but I fail to see how that a) is better than the > current workaround of editing /etc/hosts and adding a few more names for > 127.0.0.1. That gives the ability to "name" servers as a byproduct. > b) gets rid of the root-cause-bug in pan, namely that it assumes > (somewhere) that the host is a unique identifier by itself. In the > config file servers get IDs but apparently they're not used throughout. > > Hmm, I imagine if you couldn't edit /etc/hosts it would still be of > value ... Agreed... -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
