Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:39:54 -0700:
> I realize I was whining, but Charles should probably take it as a sign > of the level of interest in Pan, if he's reading. It's the program no > one bitches about that no one is actually using. The man speaks wisdom! =8^) Meanwhile, I'd love to know if my 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, etc, idea works! =8^) I've suggested it here and to others in a few other contexts, but really haven't gotten any practical yes, it works, thanks, or no, it doesn't, because... feedback. It'd be immensely helpful to others I'm reasonably likely to want to suggest this to in the future, if someone with such a setup could try it and see if it actually works as I believe it should in theory, or if there's some flaw I've missed since I've not had occasion to try it myself. (That's in addition to satisfying my own natural curiosity, of course. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
