@Darmath

You wrote you are a law student and this is certainly a very interesting 
subject to explore, without getting really involved. Unless you make your own 
viewer.

I think we agree here about the underlying common sense and the good intentions 
of everyone in this discussion. I believe we can also agree that the reworded 
TPV is way better than the previous attempt by giving clearer statements.

Having said that; there is one unambiguous statement in 7.d of the TPV that 
very clear says "You assume all risks, expenses, and defects of any Third-Party 
Viewers that you use, develop, or distribute. Linden Lab shall not be 
responsible or liable for any Third-Party Viewers." 

There is absolutely *NO* room for interpretation here. It is straight forward 
and clear.

1) A user of a third party viewer assumes *ALL* risks, expenses and defects.
2) A developer of a third party viewer assumes *ALL* risks, expenses and 
defects.
3) A distributor of a third party viewer assumes *ALL* risks, expenses and 
defects.

That is *ALL*. Unabiguous. Period.

Interesting in this context is point 3. A distributor that hosts a 3rd party 
viewer on their website with the capability to connect to SL also falls under 
TPV (if agreed upon by clickwrapping on 30 April) and assumes universal 
responsibility. This would mean LL has legal leverage against most OpenSim 
grids that host a viewer on their website if their host is also a SL resident 
*after 30 April*.

So again, there is a clear term that leaves absolutely no room for 
interpretation and as Joe Linden said in his legally not binding comment, one 
does not need to connect to SL, one only needs to design the ability to do so 
to automatically accept universal guilt.


Back to your car leasing example which is a not really suitable illustration 
anyway, for the simple reason there is no such thing as GPL for cars and they 
come with a manufacturer warranty (plus many other things like traffic law, I 
don't assemble a car after renting etc.).

But for the sake of it. In your construct there would be two things, that is 
first the renting agreement, or in SL terms ToS. And there would be another 
usage policy or TPV for that car. The latter would imply that if I rent that 
car I would automatically assume full responsibility for manufacturer defects 
(which the renting company, or LL explictely disclaims) and I would in addition 
assume full responsibility for accidents caused by 3rd parties like someone 
that crashes in my car while DUI or running a red light (or any user action in 
SL).

Pretty ridiculous, isn't it? I would certainly sign this renting agreement and 
instead go to a competitor.
Bad example anyway...

Boy
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to