On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 08:43:24AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 20:45:18 +0800
> Hangbin Liu <liuhang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Similarly to dad9b335c694 ("netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti
> > overflow"), we should not decrease promiscuity if it is already 0.
>
> This should never happen. If it is a kernel bug and should be reported
> like refcnt_t overflow.Hi Stephen, The type of promiscuity and allmulti is 'unsigned int'. That why it happened. Thanks Hangbin
